Mustang 3.8 Coil Plug Wiring Diagram

The European Commission funds the U.S. multinationals

Interesting article in the newspaper Rebirth December 1, showing how the funds almost 350 billion over seven years provided by the EU to help the development of underprivileged regions and help local SMEs (those who do not relocate), end up instead, legally, in the pockets of big corporations like Coca Cola, IBM and Nokia!

U.S. multinationals, IBM, Honeywell, McDonald's and Coca Cola are among the recipients of EU regional funds. To reveal the sensational news
a database collected by a group of British journalists who has shown how the European Commission has provided lavish financing for U.S. companies such as IBM, Coca-Cola, McDonald's and Honeywell. Then include as a beneficiary of the big pharmaceutical companies, some chains supermarkets, and European companies in the aerospace and defense, such as EADS and Dassault. Not surprisingly, to take the lead in the complaint were just the reporters of the newspaper of the City of London, Financial Times, which is linked to the British government and its finance Eurosceptic by definition and bitter enemy of a Europe independent of the Anglo-American.
investigation however shows that European structural funds are not spent. Exactly. Billion euro in fact intended to increase the depressed regions of the Old Continent remain in the coffers of Brussels, because governments do not have the financial resources additional to unlock them. From the database then it is clear that the € 347 billion so far distributed in 271 regions of 27 European countries and that over seven years, were used only ten percent of funds allocated for the period 2007-2013. But not only. The U.S. computer giant IBM is a major beneficiary of EU contracts with over 24 million € pocketed a few projects in various countries of the European Union. Of that amount 15 million and 600,000 are reserved for a service center in Wroclaw in southern Poland, the other 2.6 million for a similar center in the Czech Republic and Hungary for another 985,000. In Italy, the local subsidiary of U.S. multinational has to date received € 3 million and 700,000 for the development of a laboratory for bio-informatics and the implementation of portals Trade online, useful for small and medium-sized enterprises in tourism, cultural heritage and agri-food.
In the Netherlands, IBM has partnered with two other companies, in a pilot project funded by the European Union to the tune of € 646,542, aimed at reducing energy consumption by 14 per cent of 500 households. As for Spain, however, the Valencia region is involved in the project to increase sales of IBM with EU money, as it has acquired the server and other components for computers manufactured by the company for a sum of € 638,820. The U.S. manufacturer Honeywell
weapons and aerospace technology has received 4 million and € 200 thousand for its research and development center in the czech Republic.
Even the giant Coca-Cola is in the list, with € 902,071 allocated from Brussels for the expansion of its production lines in Hungary and Estonia, as well as for staff training in Germany. Added to this is a Belgian project whose value has not been revealed.
As for the pharmaceutical giant GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) has obtained much of € 1.8 million for its plant in Northern France aims to "increase the ability of freeze-drying of vaccines." Another great company in the same sector, Pfizer, has received € 196,352 for the construction of some projects in Belgium.
Dall’inchiesta dei giornalisti emerge un’amara verità: l’impossibilità di controllare il flusso del danaro da parte delle autorità centrali e il modo opaco in cui vengono spesi i fondi. Tra le cause principali un numero esiguo di investigatori anti-frode, pari a 25 unità, e una fitta rete di burocrati, che rende ardua la possibilità di sapere come i soldi vengono distribuiti e utilizzati. A rendere più grave la situazione è il ruolo svolto dalle regioni a cui fondi sono assegnati e in cui scompaiono tra la fitta rete delle maglie burocratiche. Per non parlare poi del sostegno dei fondi Ue sono proprio le multinazionali a stelle e strisce, battistrada dell’asservimento culturale ed economico di Washington sull’Europa-colonia.

Source: http://www.rinascita.eu/index.php?action=news&id=5260

Free Pattycake Member

Solidarity workers Comdata! No relocation!

We came to know that Comdata close to the Scarborough area of \u200b\u200bHelp Desk (phone support to customers) to transfer away from the Canavese.

Stop The network capitalism expresses total solidarity with the workers, especially the precarious certainly lose their jobs.
For twenty years we are paying the price of industrial policies based on unbridled capitalist logic, with the local affected continuous bleeding of productive activities. In an already highly critical if companies continue to lead elsewhere the production facilities, large and small, what remains of our land? Any company that relocates the impoverished territory, deprives him of excellence ricreabili difficult, eliminate jobs and no future citizens of the community residents and workers.

's time to say ENOUGH to these choices wicked!

STOP OUTSOURCING!

Tingling In Left Fingertips

Photoshop Helper: Ecco Spiegata La Mia Assenza

We finally! After a brief but intense period of silence on the blog here I am: again.

First I want to reassure you I'm not gone, the tutorial will continue to be published with the continuous constancy. You might wonder why I have not posted until now. Look, if you follow me anche su
Facebook allora saprai di un mio nuovo progetto che ho appena messo in piedi. Si chiama Photoshop Helper ed è un sevizio completamente gratuito dedicato ai tutorial di Photoshop!

Ti chiederai allora: ma non andavano bene quelli che pubblicavi sul blog! Certo però volevo fare qualcosa di più. Adesso ti racconto com’è andata.

Tutto è iniziato quando ho lanciato la

Photoshop Top Ten

, una classifica dei migliori tutorial di Photoshop sparsi per la rete. Era una rassegna mensile di 10 Tutorial di Photoshop che selezionavo come i migliori del mese.

A pochi giorni dal lancio mi arrivarono parecchie mail con wrote: "Hey Mark but this review may not be every week " or " Hello, Mark, but is not that you can send me this email several times a month ? So while I was at sea in the sun I thought about how to improve this service (from here you can see how I am obsessed for Graphics) after much consideration and after a few months I came to the conclusion. Photoshop Helper And so I came to conceive of this service, with your help. But now you ask, "But what is it? "What are you doing on this site? In a word: SHARES . If you follow me for a while 'time know that each month, but every day via Twitter and Facebook you collect, the ones that I think are the best tutorial of the day. But why do it? Why do I have, over the years, to set up a long list of sites, blogs, and good people to follow me every day flood of useful material. Here's what I do Every week starting this week I will send you an email you all the best groups of the tutorial of the week. If you want access to this opportunity as soon as possible, and do not want to miss anything, subscribe because in less than 2 days I will send my first email.

Gifts For The Mie Te

Ho creato anche un paio di

regali che ho intenzione di regalarti appena ti iscriverai alla newsletter. Ecco di che cosa sto parlando:

I Migliori 50 Tutorial Di Photoshop

Ho raccolto ben 50 Tutorial che potranno davvero tornarti utili nel migliorarti con Photoshop. Si passa dal fotoritocco alla manipolazione delle foto, effetti speciali e tanto altro.

Fotoritocco: 7 Video Guide

Se invece sei alle prime armi e ti piacerebbe imparare ad usare Photoshop per migliorare le tue fotografie queste 7 video guide di sicuro ti serviranno. Qui di seguito ti ho raggruppato tutto ciò di cui si parla: 1. Eliminare Le Zone In Ombra (59,9 MB) 2. Eliminating Imperfections - Part 1 (31.7 MB) 3. Despeckle - Part 2 (44.2 MB) 4. Illluminare Eyes (35.4 MB) 5. Perfect Skin (61.4 MB) 6. Teeth Whitening (40 MB) 7. Perfect color with Curves (41.1 MB) Talk to you soon via email!

Does Gray Goose Have Wheat In It

Protect the work from the relocation, and false experts

publish this article of the French economist Maurice Allais (translated by Maurizio Blondet, original article 'Il faut proteger contre les délocalisations the travail, par Maurice Allais, Prix Nobel d'économie', published in December 2005 on French magazine "Marianne") on globalization, unemployment in Europe and needs of protectionism :

The views I express here is that of a liberal and socialist theory together. The two concepts are inseparable in my mind, their opposition seems false and artificial. The socialist ideal is the interest in equity ridistribuzione delle ricchezze, mentre i veri liberali si preoccupano dell’efficacia della produzione della stessa ricchezza. Ai miei occhi, sono due aspetti complementari della stessa dottrina. Ed è precisamente in quanto liberale mi autorizzo a criticare le insistite posizioni ripeture dalle grandi entità sovrannazionali in favore di un libero-scambismo applicato ciecamente.

Il fondamento della crisi: l’organizzazione mondiale del commercio

La recente riunione del G-20 ha di nuovo proclamato la sua denuncia del “protezionismo”, denuncia assurda ogni volta che viene espressa senza sfumatore, com’è nel caso attuale. Siamo davanti a ciò che chiamo “i tabù undisputed "whose negative effects are strengthened and multiplied over the years. Why liberalize everything, as we begin to occur, leading to the worst riots. In contrast, among the many that are unspoken truth is the true foundation of the current crisis is the organization of global trade, which must be radical reform, and before that of the other major reform is also essential, that the banking system.

The great leaders of the planet again show their ignorance of economics, because it confuses two kinds of protectionism. Some are harmful, while others are completely justified. The first category is the protection between Comparable wage countries, protectionism is not desirable. But on the other hand, protectionism between countries with very different levels of life is not only permissible, but absolutely necessary. It 's the case of China, to which you have deleted the customs border protection is simply insane. But this also applies to countries closer together, including some within Europe. Just ask on how to combat the production costs of less than five or ten times to understand that competition is not sustainable in these cases. Especially in the face of Indian and Chinese competitors, in addition to the minimum cost of labor, skills and spirit have taken.

Given that the high unemployment current is due to this liberalization of trade, the road taken by the G-20 is highly damaging. It will be a factor in the worsening of social situation. It 's a nonsense of the first magnitude, drawn from a contradiction incredible exactly how to allocate the 1929 crisis to cause protectionism is a historical contradiction. Its true origin was reckless in the development of credit in the years that preceded it. The protectionist measures applied after the arrival of the crisis have certainly contributed to better control it.

We are therefore faced with a criminal ignorance. That the Director General of the World Trade Organization (in 2005) Pascal Lamy has called for an acceleration of global liberalization seems to me a monumental mistake, I would say monstrous. Trade, contrary to what he thinks Lamy, should not be considered an end in itself, are nothing more than half. This individual, who was first in Brussels as European Commissioner for Trade, understands nothing, unfortunately. Faced with this stubborn suicide, advance my proposal: we must relocate Pascal Lamy, a major cause of unemployment.

More specifically, the rules apply to a simple absolute: unemployment comes from the relocation, in turn due to too large differences in pay. So, what you should do is self-evident: it is necessary to establish a legitimate protezione. Da più di un decennio ho proposto di creare degli insiemi regionali più omogenei, unendo in una zona economica diversi Paesi quando questi presentano le stesse condizioni di reddito e le stesse condizioni sociali. Ognuna di queste “organizzazioni regionali” dovrebbe essere autorizzata a proteggersi ragionevolmente contro le disparità dei costi di produzione che assicurano vantaggi indebiti a certi Paesi concorrenti; ciò, pur mantenendo allo stesso tempo, all’interno di ogni zona, le condizioni di una sana e reale concorrenza tra i suoi membri associati.

Il sistema che propongo non costituirebbe un danno per i Paesi in via di sviluppo. Oggi, le grandi imprese li utilizzano per i loro bassi costi, ma partirebbero if wages increase too. These countries have an interest in adopting my principle and join their neighbors with a similar standard of living, they also develop a domestic market large enough to sustain their production, but also balanced enough to ensure that no internal competition is based only on the maintenance of low wages.

This could be applied to countries such as Eastern Europe European Union, which were built without sufficient reflection, but also those from Africa and Latin America.

The absence of such protection will lead to the destruction of all activities of each country with higher income, comprising all industries Western Europe and those of developed countries. It seems to me outrageous that by closing unprofitable sites in France or licenzino, while you open areas at lower costs (...). If there is no limits, we can already announce the French as follows: a dramatic increase in the destruction of jobs, unemployment - not only in industry but also in agriculture and services.

I'm not part of the economists who use the term "bubble". I agree that there are movements that are generalized, but the word "bubble" seems wrong to describe the unemployment generated by the relocation. In fact, his progression is of un carattere permanente e regolare da oltre trent’anni. L’essenziale della disoccupazione che subiamo risulta precisamente da questa liberalizzazione sconsiderata del commercio su scala mondiale, senza preoccuparsi del livello di vita. Non è una bolla, ma un fenomeno di fondo, com’è la liberalizzazione degli scambi.

Crisi e mondializzazione sono legati

I grandi dirigenti mondiali preferiscono riportare tutto alla moneta; ora, questa è solo una parte del problema. Crisi e mondializzazione sono legati. Regolare solo il problema monetario non basterà, non regolerà l’essenziale, che è la nociva liberalizzazione degli scambi internazionali. Il governo attribuisce le conseguenze social causes of relocation money: it is a foolish mistake.

For me, I fought the relocation in my published writings, so that my message is unknown. While the founders of the common market had anticipated the delay of several years to liberalize trade with the new members accepted in 1986, after we opened the precautionary and Europe without leaving the external protection in the face of competition from countries with costs wages so low as to render illusory defense.

If the reader will want to resume my analysis on unemployment, which I published in the past two decades, judges that the events that we see today were not only announced, but described in detail. Yet, my analysis echoes have enjoyed more limited on the mainstream press. This requires silence to question.

A Nobel viewer

economic commentators that I speak regularly on TV to analyze the causes of the current crisis are the same ones who were first to analyze the good economy, with perfect serenity. They had announced the arrival of the crisis, and do not offer anything serious out of it. But there are still calls to talk shows.

As for me, I've never been invited on television when I announced and I wrote more than a decade ago that he would soon produced a crisis of the first magnitude accompanied by unemployment, uncontrolled. I am one of those who were not allowed to explain to the French what are the real origins of the crisis when they were dispossessed of any real power on their money, for the benefit of the bankers. In the past I did get to certain programs on the economy - to which I witnessed as a viewer - that I was willing to go there to speak about what? Of what have become gradually banks today, the role of traders really dangerous, and why certain truths in their confonti are silenced. No answer, even negative, is never coming to any television channel in recent years.

This attitude poses a problem repeated on major media in France: certi esperti vi sono autorizzati, altri invece proibiti. Benchè io sia un esperto internazionalmente riconosciuto sulle crisi economiche, specie quelle del 1929 o del 1987, io resto un telespettatore. Un premio Nobel... telespettatore.

Mi trovo di fronte alle affermazioni degli specialisti che sono regolarmente invitati in TV, e che garantiscono di capire bene quel che accade e che cosa bisogna fare. Invece in realtà non capiscono nulla. La loro situazione somiglia a quella che constatai nel 1933 negli Stati Uniti, dove ero andato con lo scopo di studiare la crisi che vi infuriava, coi suoi disoccupati e i suoi senza-tetto. Vi regnava una incomprensione intellettuale totale. C’è chi si inganna doppiamente in quanto ignora la propria ignoranza; but others who know and therefore conceal, deceive the French.

This ignorance, and above all the will to hide thanks to certain media, show a decay of the debate and intelligence, because of special interest related to money. These interests who want the current economic system will endure as it is, because it works to their advantage. Among these interests are the multinationals who are the main beneficiaries, in the stock market and banking environments, an economic mechanism that enriches them at the very moment in which impoverished the majority of the population, French but also worldwide.

This raises the question: what are the mainstream media truly free? I speak their freedom with respect to the financial world and spheres of politics. Second question: Who holds the power to decide that an expert is not authorized or entitled to give an opinion on the free press? Last question: why the causes of this crisis are presented from these figures that the French do not understand deeply the economic reality? This is ignorance on their part? Those who hold the power of decision we leave the choice between listening to the ignorant or deceptive.

Maurice Allais