Solo recentemente ho conosciuto (purtroppo solo come autore) Massimo Fini . Pungente e acutissimo giornalista/scrittore "ribelle". Mi riferisco non solo ad uno dei suoi illuminanti libri (Il ribelle dalla A alla Z), ma perchè con una coerenza rara, da anni scrive e pubblica su varie testate, articoli e approfondimenti sempre "contro". Non intendo per contro la volontà di criticare, attaccare, denigrare gratuitamente le realtà sociali che ci riguardano, ma la coraggiosa e coerente visione di un mondo che viaggia inconsapevole verso una fine quasi inevitabile... E' uno dei pochi "intellettuali" (nel senso più positivo del termine) che affronta apertamente gli abusi, le violenze, le assurdità che il moderno mondo "globalizzato" ci obbliga a vivere ed a "subire". 
Così da oggi pubblicherò una sintesi di alcuni suoi pensieri tratti da un suo libro del 2006: il Ribelle dalla A alla Z, edito by Marsilio . A "dictionary" which addresses all important issues of our time with clarity, simplicity, and above all, from the point of view, although more evident every day, shows the other side of the coin, what schemes (Italian and others) do not say, or worse, subtly hidden, because to understand where we are and where we're going (at least politically, environmentally and socially) is necessary to analyze what it is, unconsciously and without the possibility of a dispute going on and that is leading our lives. (synthesis and then "editing" of excerpts from the book, are my only choice and responsibility.)
MASSIMO FINI, scrittore e giornalista, pubblica per «II Giorno», «La Nazione», «II Resto del Carlino» e «II Gazzettino». È autore di Il conformista (1990) e di due dissacranti rivalutazioni storiche: Nerone. Duemila anni di calunnie (1993), Catilina. Ritratto di un uomo in rivolta (1996). Per Marsilio ha pubblicato Di[zion]arìo erotico. Manuale contro la donna a favore della femmina (zooo2), Nietzsche. L'apolide dell'esistenza (2OO34), i saggi storico-filosofia La Ragione aveva Torto? (1985, 2005'), Elogio della guerra (1989, 2OO34), Il denaro «Sterco del demonio» (1998, 2OO34), ora disponibili in edizione tascabile, Vice obscure West. Dell'Antimodernità Manifesto (2002 and 2oo66) and subjects. Manifesto Against Democracy (20O43).
is the author, and with Eduardo Fiorillo Francesca Roveda, Massimo Fini Cyrano is against all the clichés (2005), which continues the successful experience of the play Cyrano, if you like ... which also appears as an actor.
The "cultural relativism"
For the 'cultural relativist' does not exist or systems or moral, or religious or universal principles. "Of course, since we are not made of ice, but blood, meat, feelings, emotions and do not look at reality with the cold entomologist and his slow, but we live in a concrete society, even the "relativism" has his preferences, but is aware that his is simply not an objective truth also applies to others or even for all.
For me, if the aspiration is to achieve human happiness does not say, forbidden word that the Americans had the imprudence to include in their Declaration of Independence, but a certain serenity, I think smarter, at least from the psychological point of view and maintain nerve, a company that seeks a balance in what is already there and where we are content with what you have, rather than one as ours, where tutto il meccanismo economico e produttivo e l'intero sistema spingono, con una coerenza ferrea e quasi omicida, «all'inseguimento inesausto di un futuro orgiastico, che pare sempre lì lì per essere colto, e che invece arretra costantemente davanti ai nostri occhi con la stessa inesorabilità dell'orizzonte davanti a chi abbia la pretesa di raggiungerlo»,provocando così nell'individuo, nell'uomo concreto che questa società deve viverla, frustrazione, angoscia, anomia, nevrosi, depressione e, soprattutto, una formidabile perdita di senso.
Se non esiste una morale universale, né tantomeno la certezza di un Dio, ciò significa che il «relativista» è necessariamente un amorale o, worse, an immoral, not at all . That respects the values \u200b\u200bof cultures other than their own, even when they seem aberrant, and as long as they remain within those cultures and are not meant to override other, not to say that has not its own. May be the dominant ones in society to which it belongs or, if these values \u200b\u200bdo not convince him, do not concern him, not his, or other-directed them feel hypocritical or fake, then opens for him the path traced by Nietzsche in Beyond the good and evil " will be created from it its own table of values. But this position far from being a cynical disengagement or authorization to do what we like most is on the contrary, a tremendous and promising accountability. Why does this man - and not the family, society, neighbors, bad company or 'que n'importe "- is individually and fully responsible for their actions and assume all the consequences to the community in which they live, without hesitation, without whining, without self-pity and self-justifications. Without apology. Without discount, because what has taken is a commitment to himself and to himself. This kind of man is the Rebel Alliance.
In this respect a criminal can be a moral man, if it remains faithful to the codes is given. Immoral are those good people, those pure lilies field of public affection to honor the common values \u200b\u200bof their society (perhaps regarded as "universal"), which are used to force others, and compel scandalized if they do not, and betray them later that day under the table. are men from 'double standards', a public good for the fools that we want to believe or for those who, without being simpletons, for an intimate feeling of loyalty towards their fellow citizens, and do not intend to violate a tacit, hidden , and quite to the contrary, applies only to them and their fellows who, feeling extraordinarily intelligent, have understood, or believe they have understood how things go in the world.
of these men is unfair full our complex society where the behavior of individuals are difficult to control and easily verifiable, and equally mystified and then totally lost certain values, for they, of course, but necessary in order to live together, but they were fundamental, not only among peoples "primitive" (for which the maximum shame is "losing face"), but also in every community restricted to small, simple, like the pre-industrial and pre-modern village, where everyone knew everyone and was known by all and cheating the game of life was either impossible or very difficult. These values \u200b\u200bcan be summed up into one. It's called dignity.
is the author, and with Eduardo Fiorillo Francesca Roveda, Massimo Fini Cyrano is against all the clichés (2005), which continues the successful experience of the play Cyrano, if you like ... which also appears as an actor.
The "cultural relativism"
For the 'cultural relativist' does not exist or systems or moral, or religious or universal principles. "Of course, since we are not made of ice, but blood, meat, feelings, emotions and do not look at reality with the cold entomologist and his slow, but we live in a concrete society, even the "relativism" has his preferences, but is aware that his is simply not an objective truth also applies to others or even for all.
For me, if the aspiration is to achieve human happiness does not say, forbidden word that the Americans had the imprudence to include in their Declaration of Independence, but a certain serenity, I think smarter, at least from the psychological point of view and maintain nerve, a company that seeks a balance in what is already there and where we are content with what you have, rather than one as ours, where tutto il meccanismo economico e produttivo e l'intero sistema spingono, con una coerenza ferrea e quasi omicida, «all'inseguimento inesausto di un futuro orgiastico, che pare sempre lì lì per essere colto, e che invece arretra costantemente davanti ai nostri occhi con la stessa inesorabilità dell'orizzonte davanti a chi abbia la pretesa di raggiungerlo»,provocando così nell'individuo, nell'uomo concreto che questa società deve viverla, frustrazione, angoscia, anomia, nevrosi, depressione e, soprattutto, una formidabile perdita di senso.
Se non esiste una morale universale, né tantomeno la certezza di un Dio, ciò significa che il «relativista» è necessariamente un amorale o, worse, an immoral, not at all . That respects the values \u200b\u200bof cultures other than their own, even when they seem aberrant, and as long as they remain within those cultures and are not meant to override other, not to say that has not its own. May be the dominant ones in society to which it belongs or, if these values \u200b\u200bdo not convince him, do not concern him, not his, or other-directed them feel hypocritical or fake, then opens for him the path traced by Nietzsche in Beyond the good and evil " will be created from it its own table of values. But this position far from being a cynical disengagement or authorization to do what we like most is on the contrary, a tremendous and promising accountability. Why does this man - and not the family, society, neighbors, bad company or 'que n'importe "- is individually and fully responsible for their actions and assume all the consequences to the community in which they live, without hesitation, without whining, without self-pity and self-justifications. Without apology. Without discount, because what has taken is a commitment to himself and to himself. This kind of man is the Rebel Alliance.
In this respect a criminal can be a moral man, if it remains faithful to the codes is given. Immoral are those good people, those pure lilies field of public affection to honor the common values \u200b\u200bof their society (perhaps regarded as "universal"), which are used to force others, and compel scandalized if they do not, and betray them later that day under the table. are men from 'double standards', a public good for the fools that we want to believe or for those who, without being simpletons, for an intimate feeling of loyalty towards their fellow citizens, and do not intend to violate a tacit, hidden , and quite to the contrary, applies only to them and their fellows who, feeling extraordinarily intelligent, have understood, or believe they have understood how things go in the world.
of these men is unfair full our complex society where the behavior of individuals are difficult to control and easily verifiable, and equally mystified and then totally lost certain values, for they, of course, but necessary in order to live together, but they were fundamental, not only among peoples "primitive" (for which the maximum shame is "losing face"), but also in every community restricted to small, simple, like the pre-industrial and pre-modern village, where everyone knew everyone and was known by all and cheating the game of life was either impossible or very difficult. These values \u200b\u200bcan be summed up into one. It's called dignity.
0 comments:
Post a Comment